DAWODU.COMDedicated to Nigeria's socio-political issues
2009 US DIVERSITY VISA LOTTERY INFORMATION
October 3, 2007 - December 2, 2007
LUNARPAGES.COM and IPOWERWEB.COM - Despicable WebHosts - Read My Story
|
Recommending Dates And Ballot System For The 2007 Nigerian Elections
By
Mobolaji E. Aluko, PhD Burtonsville , MD, USA
May 31, 2006
Introduction
Now that the Third-Term Agenda (TTA) is dead and buried – even though the dead body is still stinking up the country – it looks much surer now that the next handover date of this administration will be, God willing, May 29, 2007, which is a Tuesday. That better assurance has led to a flood-gate of new presidential and gubernatorial aspirants country-wide, and has more generally breathed new life into the electoral process. INEC Chairman Prof. Maurice Iwu has also found his new voice, with his first post-TTA breath being to pronounce on a window of dates, April 7 – 28, 2007, within which next year's elections required by the 1999 Constitution must be conducted. He has also finally dumped the use of the controversial Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) in the voting, even though he still maintains that electronic voter registration, voter authentication and result transmission [which, with EVM all comprise his Electronic Voting System (EVS)] still stand.
On Voting Dates
With respect to dates,
Iwu's window is not entirely accurate, however, and reflects a fixed
mindset about past election dates.
According to Sections
132 (2) (which refers to the Office of the President) and Section 178
(2) (which refers to the Office of the State Governors) of our 1999
Constitution, we have:
QUOTE
132
(2) An election to the said
office shall be held on a date not earlier than sixty days and not later
than thirty days before the expiration of the term of office of the last
holder of that office.
178
(2) An election to the office of
Governor of a State shall be held on a date not earlier than sixty days
and not later than thirty days before the expiration of the term of
office of the last holder of that office.
UNQUOTE
If you pick up your
calendar for 2007 and count backwards, 30 days BEFORE May 29, 2007 is
Sunday April 29, 2007, and 60 days BEFORE that date is Friday March 30,
2007 . So the correct window is March 30 – April 29, 2007, and not
April 7 – April 28, 2007 . The
one-week gain is important because of the stipulations that TWO POSSIBLE
election RUN-OFFS - each within seven days of the
previous inconclusive election - must be conducted in case the
presidential and gubernatorial elections are inconclusive (See Sections
133-135 and 179). Furthermore, with an eye to election petitions, one
would wish to have as long as possible time for petitions before the
installation date, or at least as soon as possible thereafter.
Some Guiding Principles
Consequently, below, I
make three recommendations in order of preference for the election dates
in 2007 between March 30 and April 29. The five principles for making
the recommendations are as follows:
(1) Thursday April 5,
2007 is Maundy Thursday; Friday April 6 is Good Friday and April 8 is
Easter Sunday for Christians. So Thursday to Sunday of that week should
therefore be out as far as elections are concerned. Eliminating
Saturday April 7 also eliminates Saturday March 31, 2007 one week
earlier, since a run-off would not be able to be conducted.
(2) Nothing in the
Constitution requires elections must be held on a Saturday, even though
that has become a tradition in Nigeria. Consequently we might require
that the FIRST convenient DAY that is NOT a Friday or Sunday (in a bow
to religious observations) shall be used for Elections.
(3) Nothing in the
Constitution requires that the Presidential and Gubernatorial elections
should be held on the same day. In fact, the more logical sequence is
to have all FEDERAL elections (President/Senate/House of Representative)
on the same day, and to have the STATE elections (Gubernatorial/State
Assemblies) on the same day.
(4) In order to
eliminate the deleterious "bandwagon" effect of the presidential
elections on state elections, the state elections should be held on the
same day or BEFORE the presidential elections.
(5) The preferred dates
should be chosen such that the MAXIMUM length of time is left between
the last possible date of the last run-off, and the May 29 hand-over
date, to give the maximum possibility for resolution of election
petitions. Thus the main elections should be concluded as quickly as
possible, possibly on the same day, or within a day or two of each
other. Also, the two run-offs for the president and governors should
thereafter be held on the same day to save time.
Based on the above five
principles, the following dates in order of preference are hereby
specified:
Recommendations on Voting Dates
Recommendation #1
State and Federal
elections are held on two separate dates, with a view of also
eliminating the presidential band-wagon effect:
* Gubernatorial/House of
Assembly Elections – Tuesday, April 3, 2007
*
Presidential/Senate/House of Representatives Elections –
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
* Run-off # 1 for
Presidential and Gubernatorial Offices - Tuesday, April 10, 2007
* Run-off # 2 for
Presidential and Gubernatorial Offices – Saturday April 14 or
Tuesday, April
17, 2007
Recommendation #2
All Federal and State
elections are held on the same day:
* Election Date – Tuesday, April 3, 2007
* Run-Off # 1 - Tuesday,
April 10, 2007
* Run Off # 2 - Tuesday
April 17, 2007
Wednesdays April 4, 11 and 18 are also possible dates here.
Recommendation #3
Main Elections Done on
the Traditional Day of Saturday Only. If we ignore the April 7 date,
then the only possible sequence with the fewest number of election days
is as follows:
* All Elections - Saturday, April 14, 2007
* Run-off # 1 for
Presidential and Gubernatorial - Saturday, April 21, 2007
* Run-off # 2 for
Presidential and Gubernatorial - Saturday, April 28, 2007
On the Recommendation of Time-Stamped, Video-Taped Secret Modified Open Ballot System (S-MOBS)
The traditional method
of voting the world over is to declare a day of election, and to specify
a period on that day of voting. Then voters go in and cast their
ballots individually and secretly at any time during that period of
day. The votes are then counted later, generally away from the eyes of
the voters.
However in the
now-famous June 12, 1993 elections in Nigeria, which has been adjudged
free and fair by most Nigerians, voters lined up over a given period of
time (say from 8 am to 12 noon) behind the two ballot boxes of the two
presidential candidates. After that lining-up period, no additional
voters were admitted to the line, so that actual counting then began
(say from 12 noon to 2 pm), all in public eye, and votes announced on
the spot no later than (say) 4 pm. This was called the Modified Open
Ballot System (MOBS), more popularly (but wrongly) called Option A-4.
While that was not a
secret ballot, most agreed that it was free and fair: the results were
hardly contestable, even though the entire elections were ingloriously
cancelled by the Ibrahim Babangida regime, which plunged the country
into a further six-year crisis.
Many Nigerians,
including members of the National Assembly, have urged a return to MOBS
or a variation of it in 2007.
However, in the upcoming
2007 elections, there are now 37 political parties, with a possibility
that there will be as many as 46 by then. It would therefore be
impractical to expect all voters to line up behind 46 ballot boxes,
assuming that each party had its own presidential candidate. Rather,
what we recommend here is a Secret Modified Open Ballot System (S-MOBS)
in which all the features of MOBS are in place EXCEPT for the lining up
behind ballot boxes. When voting begins, all voters place their marked
ballot papers into a single box, from which counting is done and
announced on the spot.
With the availability of
voter register per polling booth, one would know the maximum number of
votes that can be cast in each polling booth. Both INEC and
independent monitors should be able to ascertain the ACTUAL number of
voters that lined up in each polling booth, so that the total number of
votes cast can be checked against the addition of all the announced
results for the candidates. However, a further authentication – whose
cost might take the place of the now discarded Electronic Voting Machine
– is the use by accredited monitors of digital cameras and video-tapes
of the LINING UP and VOTING processes, which films/pictures should be
admissible as required evidence of smooth running of elections at each
polling booth.
Putting INEC on
notice
Finally, the desperation
of Nigeria's politicians to take part in elections no matter the how
clear its prospects for failure are provides a recipe for both the
Executive and the conniving INEC to sometimes delay processes vital to
such a success until the last days before the elections. The political
parties must therefore set CLEAR markers for ascertaining the
credibility of the process, and the legislatures should incorporate the
following into the new electoral law yet to be promulgated, namely:
* the poll booth
identification process: INEC should (re-)delineate the election wards
and polling booths IMMEDIATELY and publish same on their website, say
by September 30, 200;
* the voter
registration process: the voter registration should commence without
delay, and be continuous until December 30, 2006 (three months before
the election window);
* the voter roll
publication process: INEC's website must at the minimum publish (by
January 30, 2007) the roll of voters against each electoral ward;
* the candidates
identification process: all candidates for all offices should be
identified at least by February 30, 2007 (one month before the election
window).
When these minimum
conditions are fulfilled, then INEC's seriousness can begin to be
considered.
Epilogue
It is almost trite to state that the 2007 elections are again slated to be another watershed event in Nigeria. Now that we are almost certain that the Obasanjo administration will no longer be with us after May 29, 2007 , the greatest legacy that it can leave behind with the nation are free and fair elections. May God grant our request - and may Man work His will ! [Amen !]
APPENDIX
Excerpt of 1999 Nigerian Constitution
A - The President of the Federation
132. (1) An election to the office of President shall be held on a date to be appointed by the Independent National Electoral Commission. (2) An election to the said office shall be held on a date not earlier than sixty days and not later than thirty days before the expiration of the term of office of the last holder of that office. (3) Where in an election to the office of President one of the two or more candidates nominated for the election is the only candidate after the close of nomination, by reason of the disqualification, withdrawal, incapacitation, disappearance or death of the other candidates, the Independent National Electoral Commission shall extend the time for nomination. (4) For the purpose of an election to the office of President, the whole of the Federation shall be regarded as one constituency. (5) Every person who is registered to vote at an election of a member of a legislative house shall be entitled to vote at an election to the office of President. 133. A candidate for an election to the office of President shall be deemed to have been duly elected to such office where, being the only candidate nominated for the election - (a) he has a majority of YES votes over NO votes cast at the election; and (b) he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory , Abuja 134. (1) A candidate for an election to the office of President shall be deemed to have be been duly elected, where, there being only two candidates for the election - (a) he has the majority of votes cast at the election; and (b) he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory , Abuja. (2) A candidate for an election to the office of President shall be deemed to have been duly elected where, there being more than two candidates for the election- (a) he has the highest number of votes cast at the election; and (b) he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election each of at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory , Abuja. (3) In a default of a candidate duly elected in accordance with subsection (2) of this section their shall be a second election in accordance with subsection (4) of this section at which the only candidate shall be - (a) the candidate who scored the highest number of votes at any election held in accordance with the said subsection (2) of this section; and (b) one among the remaining candidates who has a majority of votes in the highest number of States, so however that where there are more than one candidate with majority of votes in the highest number of States, the candidate among them with the highest total of votes cast at the election shall be the second candidate for the election. (4) In default of a candidate duly elected under the foregoing subsections, the Independent National Electoral Commission shall within seven days of the result of the election held under the said subsections, arrange for an election between the two candidates and a candidate at such election shall be deemed elected to the office of President if - (a) he has a majority of votes cast at the election; and (b) he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory , Abuja (5) In default of a candidate duly elected under subsection (4) of this section, the Independent National Electoral Commission shall, within seven days of the result of the election held under the aforesaid subsection (4), arrange for another election between the two candidates to which the subsection relates and a candidate at such election shall be deemed to have been duly elected to the office of President, if he has a majority of the votes cast at the election.
A - Governor of a State 178. (1) An election to the office of Governor of a State shall be held on a date to be appointed by the Independent National Electoral Commission. (2) An election to the office of Governor of a State shall be held on a date not earlier than sixty days and not later than thirty days before the expiration of the term of office of the last holder of that office. (3) Where in an election to the office of Governor of a State one of the two or more candidates nominated for the election is the only candidate after the close of nomination, by reason of the disqualification, withdrawal, incapacitation, disappearance or death of the other candidates, the Independent National Electoral Commission shall extend the time for nomination. (4) For the purpose of an election under this section a State shall be regarded as one constituency. (5) Every person who is registered to vote at an election of a member of a legislative house shall be entitled to vote at an election to the office of Governor of a State. 179. (1) A candidate for an election to the office of Governor of a State shall be deemed to have been duly elected to such office where, being the only candidate nominated for the election- (a) he has a majority of YES votes over NO votes cast at the election; and (b) he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two-thirds of all the local government areas in the State, but where the only candidate fails to be elected in accordance with this subsection, then there shall be fresh nominations. (2) A candidate for an election to the office of Governor of a State shall be deemed to have been duly elected where, there being two or more candidates - (a) he has the highest number of votes cast at the election; and (b) he has not less than one-quarter of all the votes cast in each of at least two-thirds of all the local government areas in the State. (3) In default of a candidate duly elected in accordance with subsection (2) of this section there shall be a second election in accordance with subsection (4) of this section at which the only candidates shall be - (a) the candidate who secured the highest number of votes cast at the election; and (b) one among the remaining candidates who secured a majority of votes in the highest number of local government areas in the State, so however that where there are more than one candidate with a majority of votes in the highest number of local government areas, the candidate among them with the next highest total of votes cast at the election shall be the second candidate. (4) In default of a candidate duly elected under subsection (2) of this section, the Independent National Electoral Commission shall within seven days of the result of the election held under that subsection, arrange for an election between the two candidates and a candidate at such election shall be deemed to have been duly elected to the office of Governor of a State if - (a) he has a majority of the votes cast at the election; and (b) he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two-thirds of all the local government areas in the State. (5) In default of a candidate duly elected under subsection (4) of this section, the Independent National Electoral Commission shall within seven days of the result of the election held under that subsection, arrange for another election between the two candidates to which that sub-paragraph relates and a candidate at such election shall be deemed to have been duly elected to the office of governor of a State if he has a majority of the votes cast at the election.
|
© 1999 - 2006 Segun Toyin Dawodu. All rights reserved. All unauthorized copying or adaptation of any content of this site will be liable to legal recourse. Contact: webmaster@dawodu.com Segun Toyin Dawodu, P. O. BOX 710080, HERNDON, VA 20171-0080, USA. This page was last updated on 10/27/07. |